surveillance_spending

A DISCOVERY INDEX of surveillance and police-technology dollar figures found in local government meeting records across 130+ named vendors — NOT a table of confirmed spending, and NOT safe to SUM. An audit on 2026-07-29 found aggregate views were adding amounts that must not be added: the same procurement recurs at committee, council, approval, amendment and renewal stages; "not to exceed" figures are authorization ceilings, not payments. Use the canned query "the CONSERVATIVE total" for any number you intend to publish, and "data-quality report" to see what is flagged. Columns added for this: `amount_type` (stated / ceiling / proposed / recommended / estimated), `dup_rank` (>1 = redundant copy), `geo_suspect` (city disagrees with the source link), `anomaly` (implausible figure), `state_norm` (normalized state). Vendors covered include ALPR (Flock, Vigilant, Genetec), body cameras/tasers (Axon, WatchGuard, Utility, Getac), gunshot detection (ShotSpotter/SoundThinking), face recognition (Clearview AI, DataWorks Plus), fingerprint biometrics (Idemia AFIS/Livescan, filed separately under `sv:biometrics`), data fusion and OSINT (Fusus, Peregrine, LexisNexis Accurint, Thomson Reuters CLEAR), phone forensics (Cellebrite, GrayKey, Magnet), drones (Skydio, BRINC, DJI), cameras/VMS (Verkada, Avigilon), cell-site simulators, CAD/RMS records systems, photo enforcement, jail-call and student monitoring. Every row carries a VERBATIM quote from the minutes and a link to the source document, and a row only publishes if that quote was found character-for-character in the source text. READ THE `ledger` COLUMN: `sv:<category>:<vendor>`. `radio_infra` (two-way radios), `rms` (records/CAD software), `biometrics` (fingerprints) and `not_surveillance` are NOT surveillance sensors — exclude them before quoting any surveillance figure.

Data license: CC BY 4.0 · Data source: MyTown

4 rows where ledger = "sv:student:gaggle" sorted by amount descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: city, product, amount, quote, dup_rank, geo_suspect, state_norm, spend_date (date)

state 3

vendor 1

ledger 1

  • sv:student:gaggle · 4 ✖
Link rowid vendor city state spend_date product amount ▲ quote source_document mytown_record ledger amount_type dup_rank geo_suspect anomaly state_norm
3923 3923 Gaggle Alice ISD TX 2025-05-12 safety monitoring services (approve grant fund item) 140000.0 Gaggle for Safety Management and Therapy Services $140,000 https://meetings.boardbook.org/Public/Agenda/868?meeting=688610 https://mytown.theboringparts.com/city/bb-868/2025/#m15769090 sv:student:gaggle stated 1 1 0 TX
4339 4339 Gaggle East Baton Rouge Parish School System LA 2018-11-01 AI student safety monitoring (approve contract) 98674.0 Approval of a professional services contract between the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board and Gaggle in the amount of $98,674.00 to provide safety management for the district as it relates to student email accounts. https://go.boarddocs.com/la/ebrp/Board.nsf/BD-GetMinutes?open&id=B5U2C7785414 https://mytown.theboringparts.com/city/bd-la-ebrp/#m98991 sv:student:gaggle stated 1 1 0 LA
4340 4340 Gaggle East Baton Rouge Parish School System LA 2018-11-15 AI student safety monitoring (approve contract) 98674.0 Approval of a professional services contract between the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board and Gaggle in the amount of $98,674.00 to provide safety management for the district as it relates to student email accounts. https://go.boarddocs.com/la/ebrp/Board.nsf/BD-GetMinutes?open&id=B68PMB6140CF https://mytown.theboringparts.com/city/bd-la-ebrp/#m98990 sv:student:gaggle stated 2 1 0 LA
4051 4051 Gaggle Waterford CT 2024-03-20 student safety monitoring system (budget) 17280.0 o $17,280 – Gaggle; student safety monitoring system https://www.waterfordct.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_03202024-1713 https://mytown.theboringparts.com/city/waterfordct.org/2024/#m1129972 sv:student:gaggle stated 1 0 0 CT

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE surveillance_spending (
  vendor TEXT, city TEXT, state TEXT, spend_date TEXT, product TEXT,
  amount REAL, quote TEXT, source_document TEXT, mytown_record TEXT, ledger TEXT, amount_type TEXT, dup_rank INTEGER, geo_suspect INTEGER, anomaly INTEGER, state_norm TEXT);
CREATE INDEX ix_surv_vendor ON surveillance_spending(vendor);
CREATE INDEX ix_surv_state ON surveillance_spending(state);
CREATE INDEX ix_surv_amount ON surveillance_spending(amount);
CREATE INDEX ix_surv_ledger ON surveillance_spending(ledger);